Skip to content
posttrainllm docs
Esc
navigateopen⌘Jpreview
On this page

Exactness Completion Audit

Exactness Completion Audit

This audit answers one question: are the posttrainllm docs now exact enough to be trusted as the operating system for the project?

Completion Standard

The docs pass is complete when the repository has:

  1. A current docs golden path.
  2. A structured attempt ledger with evidence, status, confidence, lesson, and next action.
  3. A human-readable ledger synced to the structured ledger.
  4. A coverage audit that distinguishes attempts, technique inventory, narrative history, and learning notes.
  5. A structured treatment of the broad audit_2026.md technique audit.
  6. Factory run/report schemas that require exactness fields before publishing.
  7. A learning path and progress tracker tied to the active factory loop.
  8. Smoke checks that fail when the above surfaces drift.

Evidence

Requirement Evidence Status
Docs golden path docs/README.md, scripts/check_docs_world_class.py complete
Structured attempt ledger docs/attempts.json schema v2, scripts/check_attempt_ledger.py complete
Human-readable attempt ledger docs/attempt-ledger.md synced by evals/attempt-ledger-smoke.sh complete
Historical coverage boundary docs/history-coverage-audit.md complete
Technique audit treatment docs/techniques/audit-inventory.md, scripts/check_technique_inventory.py complete
Factory exactness fields docs/factory/run-schema.md, docs/factory/reports.md, docs/factory/case-study-template.md, scripts/check_factory_run_publish.py, native factory-run publish-check complete
Learning path docs/learn/curriculum.md, docs/learning-pipeline.md, docs/learning-progress.md, scripts/check_learning_roadmap.py complete
Rendered public docs browser Astro build renders docs including the new audit pages complete

Current Counts

Structured attempt ledger:

Metric Count
Total attempts 66
Exact confidence 49
Inferred confidence 5
Not-applicable confidence 10
Missing-evidence confidence 2

Technique audit inventory:

Bucket Count
Keep/default 45
Experimental 8
Flagged 30
Delete 0
Tracked audit rows 83

Non-Blocking Future Hardening

These are useful improvements, but they are not evidence that the docs pass is incomplete:

  1. Generate docs/attempts.json entries automatically from future factory run folders.
  2. Share implementation between the Python factory publish checker and the native Swift publish checker.
  3. Add visible status banners to every old archive/reference page.
  4. Derive docs/learning-progress.md from checklist/run metadata instead of manual edits.
  5. Add git commit, binary provenance, dataset hash, exact commands, cost, RAM, latency, tok/s, report URL, and artifact URL to future run records.

Verification

The current proof set is:

bash evals/attempt-ledger-smoke.sh
bash evals/technique-inventory-smoke.sh
bash evals/docs-world-class-smoke.sh
bash evals/factory-publish-check-smoke.sh
bash evals/learning-roadmap-smoke.sh
python3 -m py_compile scripts/check_attempt_ledger.py scripts/check_docs_world_class.py scripts/check_factory_run_publish.py scripts/check_learning_roadmap.py scripts/check_technique_inventory.py scripts/render_sql_factory_run.py
git diff --check
cd browser && npm run build

Verdict

The docs are now exact enough to operate from:

  • attempts are structured and confidence-labeled;
  • broad technique rows are classified instead of misreported as attempts;
  • old narrative surfaces have explicit treatment rules;
  • factory reports must carry exactness fields;
  • the learning path is tied to the same factory loop;
  • smoke checks guard the core docs surfaces.

Future work should improve automation and provenance depth, not reopen the basic docs exactness question.

Was this page helpful?