Experiment · pace planner

Pace planner v7 tools-in-prompt

v7 is a numbering gap, not a training version. The eleven-version count includes a version that was never trained. Retained outcome: superseded.

Outcome
superseded
Family
pace planner
Evidence confidence
exact
Record
training run

Evidence readout

tools-in-prompt serve, verb-enum grammar, and data/eval harnesses shipped; the SFT was never run

What the attempt taught

v7 is a numbering gap, not a training version. The eleven-version count includes a version that was never trained.

Why it stopped or stayed bounded

The version was never trained, and later v8-v11 planner work replaced its proposed prompt/schema direction and supplied the relevant capability evidence.

Method and scope

  • Experiment family: pace planner.
  • Record kind: training run.
  • Objective: planner oos refusal.
  • Methods: sft, lora.
  • Base models: qwen3-0.6b.

Disposition

Closed as a numbering gap. Do not cite v7 as evidence or revive it outside a new owner-led experiment.

This retained disposition is historical evidence, not authorization to restart the experiment. A new run needs a fresh question, frozen evaluator, explicit resource budget, and scoped tracking issue.

How to read this dossier

This canonical page separates the retained repository decision from the material that informed it. A source may describe an external claim, historical measurement, local observation, or planned procedure; those evidence classes are not interchangeable. Follow the provenance links before reusing a number or method.

Status and disposition describe what PostTrainLLM retained when this record was indexed. They are not a live product promise, a newly run benchmark, or permission to restart historical work. Unknown or unmeasured fields remain unknown rather than being treated as zero.

To reuse the record, first name the exact claim you need and trace it to the linked source. Then check whether the original environment, model revision, data split, evaluator, hardware, and budget match the proposed use. If they do not, treat the record as a hypothesis or design reference and run the smallest fresh comparison that can falsify it. Preserve negative outcomes and regressions beside any improvement; a local win on one slice does not silently become a general capability claim.

Source provenance

The normalized record comes from docs/attempts.json. The links below are the tracked evidence and explanatory sources preserved with the record.