Experiment · runtime perf

Speculative-decoding heads Medusa/EAGLE smoke

Speculative heads are a valid local speed path, but the production recipe is data/training heavy rather than a quick sidecar smoke. Retained outcome: worked with caveat.

Outcome
worked with caveat
Family
runtime perf
Evidence confidence
exact
Record
infrastructure

Evidence readout

baseline `232 tok/s`; Medusa 50-step `202 tok/s` at `21.7%`; Medusa 300-step `375 tok/s` at `20.8%`; EAGLE-2 50-step `200 tok/s` at `26.5%`, all bit-identical where verified

What the attempt taught

Speculative heads are a valid local speed path, but the production recipe is data/training heavy rather than a quick sidecar smoke.

Why it stopped or stayed bounded

The heads trained and verified losslessly, but acceptance stayed far below the paper recipes because this run lacked long training, logit distillation, tree attention, and a full EAGLE transformer draft block.

Method and scope

  • Experiment family: runtime perf.
  • Record kind: infrastructure.

Disposition

Revive only with self-generated data, logit-KL distillation, tree verification, and a real acceptance-rate gate.

This retained disposition is historical evidence, not authorization to restart the experiment. A new run needs a fresh question, frozen evaluator, explicit resource budget, and scoped tracking issue.

How to read this dossier

This canonical page separates the retained repository decision from the material that informed it. A source may describe an external claim, historical measurement, local observation, or planned procedure; those evidence classes are not interchangeable. Follow the provenance links before reusing a number or method.

Status and disposition describe what PostTrainLLM retained when this record was indexed. They are not a live product promise, a newly run benchmark, or permission to restart historical work. Unknown or unmeasured fields remain unknown rather than being treated as zero.

To reuse the record, first name the exact claim you need and trace it to the linked source. Then check whether the original environment, model revision, data split, evaluator, hardware, and budget match the proposed use. If they do not, treat the record as a hypothesis or design reference and run the smallest fresh comparison that can falsify it. Preserve negative outcomes and regressions beside any improvement; a local win on one slice does not silently become a general capability claim.

Source provenance

The normalized record comes from docs/attempts.json. The links below are the tracked evidence and explanatory sources preserved with the record.